Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario
November 15, 2007
Cross-examination of Dr. Barry McLellan and Dr. Michael Pollanen by Suzan Fraser, counsel for Defence for Children International-Canada.
The following is an excerpt from the transcript of the Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario. For the official transcript, or for more information about the Inquiry, visit the Inquiry web site: http://www.goudgeinquiry.ca.
[Page 1]
1
2
3
THE INQUIRY INTO PEDIATRIC FORENSIC
4
PATHOLOGY IN ONTARIO
5
6
7
8
********************
9
10
11 BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE
STEPHEN GOUDGE,
12
COMMISSIONER
13
14
15
16 Held at:
17
Offices of the Inquiry
18
180 Dundas Street West, 22nd Floor
19
Toronto, Ontario
20
21
22
********************
23
24
November 15th 2007
25
. . . . .
[Page 182]
14 CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS. SUZAN FRASER:
15
MS. SUZAN FRASER: Thank
you, Dr.
16 McLellan, Dr. Pollanen. I'm Suzan Fraser. We've met.
17
I have one (1) question that is troubling
18 me, and I'm trying to determine whether
there is any
19 significant difference between a
criminally suspicious
20 death and a suspicious death. And I'm -- the term
21 "criminally suspicious" has
been used throughout these
22 proceedings, but I'm interested in both
of your opinion
23 as to if there's a difference between
criminally
24 suspicious and suspicious, starting
with Dr. McLellan, I
25 suppose.
[Page 183]
1
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN: I
-- I think, in
2 large part, the two (2) terms are used
interchangeably.
3 We've talked about the importance of
keeping an open mind
4 when approaching any death
investigation if it, in
5 quotes, "is suspicious," I
think that means that we're
6 thinking that that is potentially
unnatural, and thinking
7 broadly that would include the
possibility of it being
8 criminally suspicious.
9
And I think in many ways the terms are
10 used interchangably.
11
MS. SUZAN FRASER: All
right. Now we've
12 also used, sometimes
homicidal/criminally suspicious
13 cases. That's been used as a title in some of the
14 guidelines, and homicidal/criminally
suspicious implies
15 some sort of thinking about the manner
of death.
16
Would you agree?
17
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN: Yes.
18
MS. SUZAN FRASER: And,
Dr. Pollanen,
19 your view as to whether there's any
value added to the
20 use of the word criminally in terms of
criminally
21 suspicious versus plain old suspicious?
22
DR. MICHAEL POLLANEN:
Well, I think it -
23 - it comes from the fact that the
police are involved.
24 These cases when they arrive to the
morgue facilities are
25 attached to police investigations, and
often higher
[Page 184]
1 levels of police investigation
including homicide
2 detectives.
3
So the -- by virtue of police involvement
4 we -- we call them criminally suspicious.
5
MS. SUZAN FRASER: All
right. And --
6
DR. MICHAEL POLLANEN:
Just -- just to
7 sort of give you a nuanced version of
that. Sometimes we
8 get cases that are brought in as
routine matters, and the
9 pathologist is the one who generates
the suspicion.
10
MS. SUZAN FRASER: Yes?
11
DR. MICHAEL POLLANEN:
Based upon the
12 autopsy findings.
13 MS.
SUZAN FRASER: Yes, I
see. All
14 right. Dr. McLellan, I have some questions for you. Dr.
15 Pollanen, you're off the hook for
probably the balance of
16 it, but we'll just see how we do here.
17
Picking up on Mr. Falconer's point, Dr.
18 McLellan, in terms of the information
that's given to a
19 family following the death of a child,
and particularly a
20 young child, I take it that the office
of the Chief
21 Coroner and coroners have no standard
information that
22 they give to family members of the
deceased upon the
23 sudden or unexpected death of a loved
one?
24
There's no standard information pamphlet
25 about the death investigation
process. Is that fair?
[Page 185]
1 DR.
BARRY MCLELLAN: There
actually is a
2 pamphlet through the office about the
coroner's death
3 investigation --
4
MS. SUZAN FRASER: Yes?
5
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN: --
that is given out
6 frequently to families. But as far as what communication
7 takes place around an individual case,
the circumstances
8 are virtually always so different that
it's not, to use
9 your term, standard communication.
10
MS. SUZAN FRASER: All
right. So -- I'm
11 sorry, I didn't know about the
existence of that; that
12 overlooked my notice.
13
But it's not mandated that coroners give
14 that pamphlet or that information sheet
to family
15 members?
16
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN: It's not mandated,
17 but it's been circulated to coroners
with a memo
18 encouraging that it be used and given
to -- to families
19 whenever possible.
20
MS. SUZAN FRASER: I see. Thank you. In
21 terms of pediatric forensic pathology,
the Office of the
22 Chief Coroner had -- has drawn a
distinction between
23 those who are under five (5) and other
children in youth.
24
Is that fair?
25
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN: Yes,
as far as the
[Page 186]
1 standardized investigation, correct.
2
MS. SUZAN FRASER: And
I understand that
3 to be because for those children who
are five (5) and
4 under, there is -- the pathology is
more complicated for
5 then children who are over five (5).
6
Is that fair?
7
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN: It's
because the
8 death investigation itself is more
complicated.
9
MS. SUZAN FRASER: All
right.
10
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN:
And that includes
11 the issue of -- of pathology.
12
MS. SUZAN FRASER: All
right. But in the
13 common medical understanding of the
word pediatrics,
14 pediatrics is medicine, as I understand
it, for children
15 and youth; that would include infants,
toddlers, and
16 young adolescents.
17
Is that fair?
18
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN: The
term pediatric
19 can, in different situations, refer to
different age
20 groups, correct.
21
MS. SUZAN FRASER: All
right. And in
22 terms of The Paediatric Death Review
Committee, what is
23 the age range -- age range for the
deaths that that
24 committee reviews?
25
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN: There
is no absolute
[Page 187]
1 cutoff. There have been deaths reviewed up to the ages
2 of eighteen (18), and there have in
fact, in isolated
3 circumstances been some complicated
deaths over the age
4 of eighteen (18) that have still been
reviewed by that
5 committee.
6
MS. SUZAN FRASER: All
right. So it --
7 The Paediatric Death Review uses a more
common -- is it
8 more common in terms of the word --
takes the common --
9 never mind that questions at all.
10
But generally what
we understand for
11 pediatrics being used in general
medicine, if you go to a
12 pediatrician, that the committee would
look at young
13 people who would be eighteen (18) and
under.
14
Is that fair?
15 DR.
BARRY MCLELLAN: This may be
of
16 assistance. We have other review committees in the
17 office. One is the Patient Safety Review Committee.
18
And it may be that for a complex medical
19 manner that in -- in one (1) situation
where it appears
20 that it's of more pediatric expertise,
it may go to The
21 Paediatric Death Review Committee. And another it may
22 appear to be surrounding an issue that
may potentially be
23 more systemic in a hospital environment,
and in that case
24 it may go to The Patient Safety
Committee, so it's up to
25 the regional coroner to use discretion
as to where best
[Page 188]
1 to send the case for review.
2
MS. SUZAN FRASER: All
right. And in
3 terms of your office, I take it that the
office of the
4 Chief Coroner during your time did not
have a youth
5 advisory committee or a young people
advising either The
6 Paediatric Death Committee or your
office.
7
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN:
There has not been a
8 youth advisory committee, no.
9
MS. SUZAN FRASER: All
right. And in
10 terms of the -- turning to the
legislation, the deaths
11 that are to be reported, and in terms
of children, we
12 understand that deaths must be reported
where a child
13 dies in a child residence -- and if
it's helpful, Dr.
14 McLellan, I can have the registrar pull
up the
15 legislation.
16
Would that be helpful?
17
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN:
Well, it may be
18 helpful for others; I have it right in
front of me here.
19
MS. SUZAN FRASER: All
right, that's --
20 that's from the institutional report,
Mr. Registrar, and
21 it's page 76. And if you could turn to the next page,
22 page 77.
23
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN: In
my document it's
24 page 78, but --
25
MS. SUZAN FRASER: And
I think that's
[Page 189]
1 what it will end up being, Dr.
McLellan.
2
DR. BARRY
MCLELLAN: It's Section 10
3 you're probably looking for.
4
MS. SUZAN FRASER: Yeah. If you could go
5 to page 78, Registrar. My apologies. Page 79. Thank
6 you.
7
We have both where a child dies in
8 residence; and I take it that would
include a group home?
9
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN: Yeah,
so I -- on my
10 document here, it's on the bottom of
page 78, we have
11 subsection 2(b), a children's residence
under Part 9,
12 Licensing of the Child and Family
Services Act or
13 premises.
14
MS. SUZAN FRASER: Yes. And that would
15 include a group home?
16
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN: Correct.
17
MS. SUZAN FRASER: All
right. And we
18 also know that it would also include --
would it include
19 foster care?
20
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN: Depending
upon where
21 the foster care is provided, yes.
22
MS. SUZAN FRASER: Yes,
all right. And
23 in terms of children -- death involving
children who are
24 outside of the care of their parents,
they may be in the
25 custody of the state in a youth justice
facility, and in
[Page 190]
1 those circumstances a death would -- an
investigation
2 would be mandatory and in inquest would
be mandatory.
3
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN: Correct.
4
MS. SUZAN FRASER: All
right. And for
5 the children who are in the care of the
Children's Aid
6 Societies or who have had contact or an
open file with
7 the Children's Aid Society under the
current mandate of
8 The Paediatric Death Review Committee,
those deaths would
9 be reviewed by that committee.
10
Is that fair?
11
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN:
Correct.
12
MS. SUZAN FRASER: All
right. And are
13 you aware, Dr. McLellan, that in 2003
Defence for
14 Children International produced a
report, and that's at
15 Tab 20 of Volume III, and for counsel,
that was produced
16 separately in PDFs from our office on
Monday.
17
Do you have it, Dr. McLellan?
18
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN: I
do.
19
MS. SUZAN FRASER: All
right. And that
20 report really was about the need for
there to be an
21 independent advocate for children and
youth, but at page
22 23 it touched on the death review
process in The
23 Paediatric Death Review Committee, so
I'd ask you turn
24 that up, please.
25
[Page 191]
1
(BRIEF PAUSE)
2
3
MS. SUZAN FRASER: So
it starts on page
4 23 and then turning to page 24:
5
"What the report does is it details the
6
fact that The Paediatric Death Review
7
Committee was formed under the
8
leadership of the Ontario Association
9
of Children's Aid Societies and the
10
Office of the Chief Coroner."
11
And did the report get that right, Dr.
12 McLellan?
13
DR. BARRY MCLELLAN: I
would have to go
14 back in history. My understanding is is was formed under
15 the leadership of the Office of the
Chief Coroner.
16
MS. SUZAN FRASER: All
right. But it
17 indicates further down that: